<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogHer &#8217;08 &#8211; Too many parties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/</link>
	<description>&#34;If you don&#039;t know where you are going, any road will take you there.&#34; - Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:32:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Getgood</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Getgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>Loralee -- not sad at all. The 3-plug outlet was the best, most useful piece of swag there. I use it all the time -- more even than the bluetooth headset.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loralee &#8212; not sad at all. The 3-plug outlet was the best, most useful piece of swag there. I use it all the time &#8212; more even than the bluetooth headset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loralee</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>Loralee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail right on the head.

Especially about the best swag. Those two pieces made me ridiculously happy (Although is it sad that the 3-plug outlet was my VERY favorite thing?)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail right on the head.</p>
<p>Especially about the best swag. Those two pieces made me ridiculously happy (Although is it sad that the 3-plug outlet was my VERY favorite thing?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim/hormone-colored days</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim/hormone-colored days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>Great summary, as always. I agree on the excess of swag, though you neglected to mention that the folks from Zwaggle.com were there to help us recycle or repurpose our unwanted goods. If they take part next year, I hope they will remain ready to receive items on Sunday, once everyone is packed and has made their final choices about what goes home and what stays behind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary, as always. I agree on the excess of swag, though you neglected to mention that the folks from Zwaggle.com were there to help us recycle or repurpose our unwanted goods. If they take part next year, I hope they will remain ready to receive items on Sunday, once everyone is packed and has made their final choices about what goes home and what stays behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, as usual. I ended up not attending all of the parties I RSVP&#039;d for because it was too much. I couldn&#039;t get from one to the next fast enough, and I wanted to stay and hang out with people. I really wish I had stayed at the Alltop party longer, and got to the People&#039;s Party sooner.

I don&#039;t have a problem with private parties at all, although I agree they should be before or after conference events, and I wish they weren&#039;t all on Thursday night. A party was held on Friday night that started after the cocktail party, and I thought that was a great idea for people who didn&#039;t want to stop after 9pm.

And shipping swag home would be a great idea. They did it at the J&amp;J event earlier this year, and I really appreciated it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, as usual. I ended up not attending all of the parties I RSVP&#8217;d for because it was too much. I couldn&#8217;t get from one to the next fast enough, and I wanted to stay and hang out with people. I really wish I had stayed at the Alltop party longer, and got to the People&#8217;s Party sooner.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with private parties at all, although I agree they should be before or after conference events, and I wish they weren&#8217;t all on Thursday night. A party was held on Friday night that started after the cocktail party, and I thought that was a great idea for people who didn&#8217;t want to stop after 9pm.</p>
<p>And shipping swag home would be a great idea. They did it at the J&#038;J event earlier this year, and I really appreciated it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Flinger</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Flinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>Susan, you expressed my thoughts exactly. I had a great time and found real friendships. But for me, I&#039;m moving beyond blogging as a hobby and using it now to cultivate a business and meet with clients (like yourself) and will be writing off next year&#039;s trip. I&#039;d like to know I&#039;m promoting my self as a business woman and find tips on how to succeed in this arena.

And sure, sure, I went as a personal blogger who licked people. But it&#039;s all good. ;-)

The swag and money, though, I&#039;d be happy to give up in favor of donations. My children and I have enough &quot;stuff&quot; to go around. I was there for the personal connections anyway, not the swag.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, you expressed my thoughts exactly. I had a great time and found real friendships. But for me, I&#8217;m moving beyond blogging as a hobby and using it now to cultivate a business and meet with clients (like yourself) and will be writing off next year&#8217;s trip. I&#8217;d like to know I&#8217;m promoting my self as a business woman and find tips on how to succeed in this arena.</p>
<p>And sure, sure, I went as a personal blogger who licked people. But it&#8217;s all good. <img src='http://getgood.com/roadmaps/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The swag and money, though, I&#8217;d be happy to give up in favor of donations. My children and I have enough &#8220;stuff&#8221; to go around. I was there for the personal connections anyway, not the swag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Getgood</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Getgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>Mena - thanks for leaving a comment. Six Apart certainly wasn&#039;t the only company that held an event during conference hours or that hosted a suite.  On principle, I dislike such shadow conferences, a regular feature at other industry events, because they distract people from the official event.

Sponsors pay good money to BlogHer for their exhibit space. This benefits the entire community in keeping registration costs down. A private event draws people away from the conference and only benefits the company throwing it. Not fair to the official sponsors at all.

I&#039;m glad to hear that your suite was open to all throughout the conference. Drop-in suites are less problematic, although I still think the companies should be official sponsors at some level.

The fact remains however that you did hold a cocktail party Friday afternoon during the final programming timeslot. Say what you will about not knowing *what* the content would be before you went to the expense of planning the party, you still had to know that your party would be in conflict with the final programming of the afternoon. In my opinion, that was wrong.

It just gets worse when the content becomes a Community Keynote and not just a regular conference speech.

As to my comments on platform, regular readers of my blog already knew about my decision to move from TypePad to another platform; I mentioned it earlier this summer. Nothing to do with the party faux pas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mena &#8211; thanks for leaving a comment. Six Apart certainly wasn&#8217;t the only company that held an event during conference hours or that hosted a suite.  On principle, I dislike such shadow conferences, a regular feature at other industry events, because they distract people from the official event.</p>
<p>Sponsors pay good money to BlogHer for their exhibit space. This benefits the entire community in keeping registration costs down. A private event draws people away from the conference and only benefits the company throwing it. Not fair to the official sponsors at all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear that your suite was open to all throughout the conference. Drop-in suites are less problematic, although I still think the companies should be official sponsors at some level.</p>
<p>The fact remains however that you did hold a cocktail party Friday afternoon during the final programming timeslot. Say what you will about not knowing *what* the content would be before you went to the expense of planning the party, you still had to know that your party would be in conflict with the final programming of the afternoon. In my opinion, that was wrong.</p>
<p>It just gets worse when the content becomes a Community Keynote and not just a regular conference speech.</p>
<p>As to my comments on platform, regular readers of my blog already knew about my decision to move from TypePad to another platform; I mentioned it earlier this summer. Nothing to do with the party faux pas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jory Des Jardins</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jory Des Jardins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Susan, thank you for this post! As a co-founder of BlogHer I&#039;ve struggled to define what extracurriculars are &quot;good&quot; for the conference and which ones threaten to take away from the sense of community. You&#039;ve provided some sound explanation behind what doesn&#039;t work. When creating all of the sponsorships this year we actively planned special events during free periods. We refer to anything during conference hours as &quot;attendee time&quot; and were pleased to see how respectful our sponsors were to it.

Where we fall into some difficulty is with groups who are not &quot;officially&quot; sponsors, as we don&#039;t get the opportunity to coordinate with them as much, but in some cases orgs reached out to us and asked us how they could add to the event, not compete with it. Believe me, it makes a huge difference.

Still, I had some misgivings about the invite only events, which at times were billed as &quot;BlogHer&quot; events--it confused attendees who wondered why the opportunity was not open to everyone, and at times it confused sponsors. I will continue to be a huge PITA and urge these orgs to NOT do this.

Thanks again for this post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, thank you for this post! As a co-founder of BlogHer I&#8217;ve struggled to define what extracurriculars are &#8220;good&#8221; for the conference and which ones threaten to take away from the sense of community. You&#8217;ve provided some sound explanation behind what doesn&#8217;t work. When creating all of the sponsorships this year we actively planned special events during free periods. We refer to anything during conference hours as &#8220;attendee time&#8221; and were pleased to see how respectful our sponsors were to it.</p>
<p>Where we fall into some difficulty is with groups who are not &#8220;officially&#8221; sponsors, as we don&#8217;t get the opportunity to coordinate with them as much, but in some cases orgs reached out to us and asked us how they could add to the event, not compete with it. Believe me, it makes a huge difference.</p>
<p>Still, I had some misgivings about the invite only events, which at times were billed as &#8220;BlogHer&#8221; events&#8211;it confused attendees who wondered why the opportunity was not open to everyone, and at times it confused sponsors. I will continue to be a huge PITA and urge these orgs to NOT do this.</p>
<p>Thanks again for this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mena</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Hi -- I just want to chime in with my take on your post. (I&#039;m the founder &amp; president of Six Apart). While I would agree with your assessment of private parties, a lot of the information about Six Apart isn&#039;t quite accurate.

1. The Six Apart was only private in that it wasn&#039;t sponsored by Blogher. Anyone was welcome to join us in the suite and we blogged/twittered about it at multiple times. All of these blog posts were public, as well as the twitter posts. We wanted anyone -- regardless of platform -- to stop by:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/6mk7or&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/6mk7or&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/598um8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/598um8&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860402915&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860402915&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860077948&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860077948&lt;/a&gt;

We had postcards to hand out but we were not pushy so as not to be insensitive to the official sponsors. If we were standing in the middle of the ballroom handing the cards out, I think that would have been more offensive.

2. I believe that we scheduled the party before the community keynote was announced and on the schedule -- this is what I was told when I asked why there was an overlap. We were actually disappointed we all couldn&#039;t attend that session since so many Six Apart folks were attending the conference and loving every moment. But we had printed the cards, planned the party, invited people, etc.

3. We had the Six Apart suite during the length of the entire conference. No one was limited to visiting us only during the keynote and if you wanted to stop by during a break that was encouraged. The party actually lasted longer than the keynote (I believe) so women stopped by after the official program ended.

4. We held it at the hotel not to steal thunder from the conference but because it was most convenient for the attendees. How else could you stop by for 10 minutes if it wasn&#039;t just a walk and ride up an elevator?

5. Six Apart wasn&#039;t an official sponsor, true. We&#039;d love to sponsor all conferences but, money and budget is always a consideration. I don&#039;t think just giving a conference a big check is the only way to support it.  Over the years our involvement has included formal sponsorship, being a bag sponsor, attendance and speaking. While our participation varies every year, we always participate. This isn&#039;t to say we wouldn&#039;t be an official sponsor next year -- we just didn&#039;t this year.

6. As far as the statements about switching platforms go, I have to just say that if saw our offices, you&#039;d have a hard time questioning our support for women bloggers and women in this industry (as well as the idea that we want to promote exclusivity). Our goal is to have a fair balance of men and women in our organization, and we&#039;re merely doing better than anyone else in blogging by a long shot. If we have more women in attendance at Blogher than some of our competitors have women employed, I think that&#039;s a good thing.

Could we have better executed the party? Of course! Everything can be improved the second time. We met tons of great women (on our platform and not on our platform) at the conference and in our suite. I attended almost every session (as well as spoke) and felt a huge rush afterwards.

We&#039;re trying to help all bloggers (men and women) make a living off their blogs and an event like Blogher definitely reaffirms that we can do even more.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8212; I just want to chime in with my take on your post. (I&#8217;m the founder &#038; president of Six Apart). While I would agree with your assessment of private parties, a lot of the information about Six Apart isn&#8217;t quite accurate.</p>
<p>1. The Six Apart was only private in that it wasn&#8217;t sponsored by Blogher. Anyone was welcome to join us in the suite and we blogged/twittered about it at multiple times. All of these blog posts were public, as well as the twitter posts. We wanted anyone &#8212; regardless of platform &#8212; to stop by:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6mk7or" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6mk7or</a><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/598um8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/598um8</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860402915" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860402915</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860077948" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/sixapart/statuses/860077948</a></p>
<p>We had postcards to hand out but we were not pushy so as not to be insensitive to the official sponsors. If we were standing in the middle of the ballroom handing the cards out, I think that would have been more offensive.</p>
<p>2. I believe that we scheduled the party before the community keynote was announced and on the schedule &#8212; this is what I was told when I asked why there was an overlap. We were actually disappointed we all couldn&#8217;t attend that session since so many Six Apart folks were attending the conference and loving every moment. But we had printed the cards, planned the party, invited people, etc.</p>
<p>3. We had the Six Apart suite during the length of the entire conference. No one was limited to visiting us only during the keynote and if you wanted to stop by during a break that was encouraged. The party actually lasted longer than the keynote (I believe) so women stopped by after the official program ended.</p>
<p>4. We held it at the hotel not to steal thunder from the conference but because it was most convenient for the attendees. How else could you stop by for 10 minutes if it wasn&#8217;t just a walk and ride up an elevator?</p>
<p>5. Six Apart wasn&#8217;t an official sponsor, true. We&#8217;d love to sponsor all conferences but, money and budget is always a consideration. I don&#8217;t think just giving a conference a big check is the only way to support it.  Over the years our involvement has included formal sponsorship, being a bag sponsor, attendance and speaking. While our participation varies every year, we always participate. This isn&#8217;t to say we wouldn&#8217;t be an official sponsor next year &#8212; we just didn&#8217;t this year.</p>
<p>6. As far as the statements about switching platforms go, I have to just say that if saw our offices, you&#8217;d have a hard time questioning our support for women bloggers and women in this industry (as well as the idea that we want to promote exclusivity). Our goal is to have a fair balance of men and women in our organization, and we&#8217;re merely doing better than anyone else in blogging by a long shot. If we have more women in attendance at Blogher than some of our competitors have women employed, I think that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
<p>Could we have better executed the party? Of course! Everything can be improved the second time. We met tons of great women (on our platform and not on our platform) at the conference and in our suite. I attended almost every session (as well as spoke) and felt a huge rush afterwards.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re trying to help all bloggers (men and women) make a living off their blogs and an event like Blogher definitely reaffirms that we can do even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb on the Rocks</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb on the Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard lots of buzz about the Six Apart faux pas (and that of the bloggers who skipped the keynote to attend), but no one has assessed the meaning behind it as well as you have.  Very interesting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard lots of buzz about the Six Apart faux pas (and that of the bloggers who skipped the keynote to attend), but no one has assessed the meaning behind it as well as you have.  Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Getgood</title>
		<link>http://getgood.com/roadmaps/2008/07/26/blogher-08-too-many-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Getgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://getgood.com/roadmaps/?p=531#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Lindsay -- I agree, exclusiveness creates division. What was so great about the CheesburgHer Party, and why it was my favorite party, was that you welcomed everyone. It didn&#039;t even matter if you didn&#039;t get a burger or even a drink. It was just fun to be talking with friends and sharing in the hilarity.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindsay &#8212; I agree, exclusiveness creates division. What was so great about the CheesburgHer Party, and why it was my favorite party, was that you welcomed everyone. It didn&#8217;t even matter if you didn&#8217;t get a burger or even a drink. It was just fun to be talking with friends and sharing in the hilarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

