{"id":591,"date":"2008-11-02T22:27:55","date_gmt":"2008-11-03T02:27:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/?p=591"},"modified":"2008-11-03T11:03:38","modified_gmt":"2008-11-03T15:03:38","slug":"revisiting-the-3rs-of-blogger-relations-part-1-respect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2008\/11\/02\/revisiting-the-3rs-of-blogger-relations-part-1-respect\/","title":{"rendered":"Revisiting the 3Rs of Blogger Relations, Part 1: Respect"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Quite some time ago, my friend David Wescott wrote a post outlining the <a href=\"http:\/\/itsnotalecture.blogspot.com\/2007\/10\/three-rs-of-blogger-relations.html\" target=\"_blank\">3R&#8217;s of blogger relations<\/a>: Respect, Relationship and Relevance, a framework quite similar to <a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/category\/blogging\/blogger-relations\/\" target=\"_blank\">my own approach<\/a> both at the time and still.<\/p>\n<p>Not at all surprising, since a shared conviction about how to engage with bloggers was how we met in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>Since I am more or less relaunching Marketing Roadmaps at this new URL, I thought it would be a good time to revisit these core concepts.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start with Respect.<\/p>\n<p>What made David&#8217;s post <em>so good<\/em> was the introduction of the word <strong>Respect<\/strong>. Most of the thinkers in the space (myself included) had been talking about Relationship and Relevance as well as <em>the ideas<\/em> he categorized as Respect. But his post was the first time, to my knowledge, that anyone applied the actual word.<\/p>\n<p>And it is such a perfect word to describe the attitude with which you,\u00a0 the pitcher, should approach the blogger, the pitchee. Yes I know that is not a word. Sue me.<\/p>\n<p>With <strong>respect<\/strong>. For his time. For the passions that fuel her blog. For the person. For the blog.<\/p>\n<p>Here are some of the things that demonstrate lack of respect for the blogger that have crossed my desk in the last few months, either directly or forwarded from friends.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Messy emails, with multiple fonts, addressed to Dear Blogger, Name not available or some such. Probably forwarded more than once,<\/li>\n<li>No actual signature, just a boiler plate email signature. Even worse\u00a0 &#8211;\u00a0 an email sent from one account but signed by another person. Really has that personal touch, you know.<\/li>\n<li>Pitches to review books that want the blogger to flog the book or interview the author but don&#8217;t offer a review copy. Why on earth would anyone do that?<\/li>\n<li>Repeated follow-ups, often through multiple channels. One is acceptable. After that you are stalking. Back off.<\/li>\n<li>Refusing to provide review product after sending a pitch. Hullo &#8212; you got a hit. Assuming you targeted properly (yeah I know, big assumption), you should PLAN on sending review product. Offering a jpeg? Not good enough.<\/li>\n<li>Pretense. Here&#8217;s a recent example. Sara from Suburban Oblivion relates a pitch she received from a product geared to preteen girls. She was somewhat interested and requested review product. The company refused, and not in the most elegant fashion. Bad enough, really, but when Sara <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suburbanoblivion.com\/2008\/10\/24\/hi-please-bend-over-for-us-btw-its-not-our-policy-to-use-lube\/\" target=\"_self\">blogged <\/a>the story, someone related to the company left an unattributed positive comment on the blog. Read the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suburbanoblivion.com\/2008\/10\/27\/new-moon-girls-saga-continues-now-with-true-suckage-2\/#comments\" target=\"_blank\">denoument <\/a>on Suburban Oblivion. Remember &#8212; pretend is a great game for children, and even has its place in our adult lives, but it is <strong>not <\/strong>an appropriate blogger relations tactic.<\/li>\n<li>Invitations to events the blogger couldn&#8217;t possible attend.\u00a0 Even worse, press releases about PAST events to which you did not invite the blogger at all.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you are going to reach out to bloggers, you must develop a very healthy respect for the the fact that most bloggers have no <em>intrinsic <\/em>reason to be interested in what you have to say. They may indeed be your customers and interested in your product, but it is not <em>their job <\/em>to promote your product. <strong>That&#8217;s your job.<\/strong> If you want their help, you have got to put it in a context that is important to them. That&#8217;s the concept of Relevance, which we&#8217;ll review later this week<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>In a special hell all its own is the absolutely awful pitch that made the rounds last week following the family tragedy of actress Jennifer Hudson. I won&#8217;t link to it here, but here are some commentaries from Twitter pals <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ladybuglandings.com\/2008\/10\/bad-press-release\/\" target=\"_blank\">Katja Presnal<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.parmet.net\/pr\/2008\/10\/28\/unbelievable\/\" target=\"_blank\">David Parmet<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/badpitch.blogspot.com\/2008\/10\/bad-pitch-outrage.html\" target=\"_blank\">Kevin Dugan.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I wish this was the first time in my life I had seen such a piss poor PR reaction to a tragedy, but it isn&#8217;t. People are blinded by the perceived relevance of their product and lose all perspective about the personal nature of tragedies. It&#8217;s stupid, tasteless, disrespectful and shows a total lack of common sense. And happens all the time.\u00a0 It&#8217;s also easy to avoid. When the temptation strikes to capitalize on tragedy, and it well may, <strong>just say no. <\/strong>There is absolutely no way your product is SO RELEVANT that it merits the disgraceful behavior of capitalizing on another person&#8217;s tragedy. Full stop.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Finally, all practicing PR people should read BL Ochman&#8217;s post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whatsnextblog.com\/archives\/2008\/10\/pr_industry_leaders_put_their_feet_in_their_mouths_at_critical_issues_forum.asp\">PR Industry Leaders Put Their Feet in Their Mouths at Critical Issues Forum<\/a> and ask themselves, is this me? Am I doing better or perpetuating the problem? What can I do better?<\/p>\n<p>One of the things we can most definitely do better is to improve the relevancy of our pitches, and not just to bloggers. To journalists too. More on that later this week.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p><strong>UPDATE, 11\/3<\/strong>: This post hadn&#8217;t been up a day before a friend, a Massachusetts mom blogger whose home page clearly states her name and state, tweeted about the pitch below. Unfortunately, I couldn&#8217;t ask for a better example of the importance of respect for the blogger, especially since the event is for a good cause which is also tarnished by the bad pitch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/seattleevent.jpg?ssl=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-593\" title=\"seattleevent\" src=\"https:\/\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/seattleevent.jpg?resize=477%2C303&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"477\" height=\"303\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quite some time ago, my friend David Wescott wrote a post outlining the 3R&#8217;s of blogger relations: Respect, Relationship and Relevance, a framework quite similar to my own approach both at the time and still. Not at all surprising, since a shared conviction about how to engage with bloggers was how we met in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":""},"categories":[36,23,8],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=591"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":592,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591\/revisions\/592"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}