{"id":682,"date":"2009-03-07T17:38:43","date_gmt":"2009-03-07T22:38:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/?p=682"},"modified":"2009-03-07T17:38:43","modified_gmt":"2009-03-07T22:38:43","slug":"blogger-relations-connect-with-passions-values-not-products","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2009\/03\/07\/blogger-relations-connect-with-passions-values-not-products\/","title":{"rendered":"Blogger Relations: Connect with passions &#038; values, not products"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/graphic2.jpg?ssl=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-683\" style=\"margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;\" title=\"graphic2\" src=\"https:\/\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/03\/graphic2.jpg?resize=180%2C150&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"graphic2\" width=\"180\" height=\"150\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>My <a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2009\/03\/02\/blogger-relations-a-fishful-update\/\" target=\"_blank\"><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2009\/03\/02\/too-little-too-late-too-lame-initial-thoughts-on-fishfulthinking\/\" target=\"_blank\">posts <\/a>earlier this week about Pepperidge Farm&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fishfulthinking.com\/default.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">Fishful Thinking<\/a> initiative focused on the errors in execution of the blogger outreach. I&#8217;m done with analyzing these errors.<\/p>\n<p>Pepperidge Farm has personally apologized in email to at least some of the affected bloggers, the marketing agency spoke to a number on the phone and via email, and at least one attended today&#8217;s symposium in White Plains as an observer. Let&#8217;s let things play out.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, there is one more important lesson for us, so bide with me a while.<\/p>\n<p>One of the reasons the situation erupted was because the pitch was perceived as <strong>valuable <\/strong>by the mom bloggers. On its face, the Fishful Thinking initiative accomplishes one of the things I regularly preach in blogger relations; it connects with parents over<strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2009\/02\/23\/engaging-with-your-community-your-customer\/\" target=\"_blank\">a shared value<\/a><\/strong> &#8211; the desire to raise optimistic kids. Especially in this economy, when we are all faced with the necessity of telling our children they can&#8217;t have something that in better times we might have been able to give. Throw in the stipend, and it&#8217;s no wonder the response was so high.<\/p>\n<p>But, by their own admission, they didn&#8217;t have an entirely clear idea of what sort of mom they were looking for when they started the outreach.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what I would have done differently. Yes, I know I am in the comfy chair of an armchair quarterback, but if you know me, you&#8217;ll recognize the general approach.<\/p>\n<p>As I&#8217;ve noted above, I believe the Fishful Thinking program would be attractive to quite a few parents simply for its content &#8212; without the enticement of the trip to White Plains and the stipend.\u00a0 Since the company is also planning on building a wider network of parents (1000 according to Mr. Youth CEO Matt Britton), my question is: <em>why didn&#8217;t they start there?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>With a broad outreach to parent bloggers about the program on its merits. Perhaps with an offer to send one of the expert&#8217;s books. Or offering a conference call with the expert on a specific topic.<\/p>\n<p>The Fishful Thinking program might not be everyone&#8217;s cuppa, but it definitely connects with parents around passions and values, not simply Goldfish. That&#8217;s such a good start; it makes all the execution errors even more of a shame.<\/p>\n<p>I am certain &#8212; dead certain &#8212; that potential candidates for the &#8220;faculty&#8221;, really good candidates (and that&#8217;s not to say that the 10 they&#8217;ve picked are not good) would have self-identified by taking the company up on its <strong>simple <\/strong>offer. The women would have written because the information offered intrinsic value to them, their blog, their readership.<\/p>\n<p>That would have been a far better and more defensible pool of candidates for the influencer program. Execution would still be critical &#8211;it always is &#8212; but there wouldn&#8217;t be so many questions about the criteria.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s what I would have done. Start simple and progress to the complex. YMMV.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Stepping into the circle of shameless self promotion,\u00a0 if you like the general approach and you&#8217;re planning a blogger outreach campaign, <a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/contact\/\" target=\"_blank\">call <\/a>or <a href=\"mailto:sgetgood@getgood.com\" target=\"_blank\">email <\/a>me.\u00a0 I&#8217;d love to help you develop a program that connects with the passions and values of <em><strong>your <\/strong><\/em>customers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My posts earlier this week about Pepperidge Farm&#8217;s Fishful Thinking initiative focused on the errors in execution of the blogger outreach. I&#8217;m done with analyzing these errors. Pepperidge Farm has personally apologized in email to at least some of the affected bloggers, the marketing agency spoke to a number on the phone and via email, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":""},"categories":[36,5],"tags":[51,52],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}