{"id":877,"date":"2010-06-09T22:39:30","date_gmt":"2010-06-10T03:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/?p=877"},"modified":"2010-06-17T16:21:30","modified_gmt":"2010-06-17T21:21:30","slug":"the-scoop-on-facebook-contests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2010\/06\/09\/the-scoop-on-facebook-contests\/","title":{"rendered":"The scoop on Facebook contests"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"zemanta-img\" style=\"margin: 1em; display: block;\">\n<div>\n<dl class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"width: 255px;\">\n<dt class=\"wp-caption-dt\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\/company\/facebook\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...\" src=\"https:\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.crunchbase.com\/assets\/images\/resized\/0000\/4561\/4561v1-max-250x250.png?resize=245%2C100\" alt=\"Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...\" width=\"245\" height=\"100\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/dt>\n<dd class=\"wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution\" style=\"font-size: 0.8em;\">Image via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crunchbase.com\">CrunchBase<\/a><\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>This morning, Mom 101\u00a0<a href=\" http:\/\/twitter.com\/Mom101\/status\/15790753164 \" target=\"_blank\">tweeted <\/a>that a contest that requires \u201cliking\u201d a \u00a0<a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Facebook\" rel=\"homepage\" href=\"http:\/\/facebook.com\">Facebook<\/a> page for entry violates the Facebook Terms of Service, and linked to my <a href=\"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/2010\/01\/05\/facebooks-new-contest-rules-and-ftc-guidelines-has-social-media-marketing-adapted\/\" target=\"_blank\">post <\/a>from last January about the new Facebook (FB) contest rules.\u00a0Her tweet spawned an interesting Twitter stream that made it clear that both companies and bloggers are still unclear about the Facebook contest rules.<\/p>\n<p>Walk this way for some clarity. Keep in mind, I am not a lawyer and do not play one on the interwebs. However, I\u2019m good at parsing legalese, and pretty sure I\u2019ve got the right end of the stick here.<\/p>\n<p>Mom 101 is right and here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line, Facebook doesn\u2019t want any explicit involvement in ANY of your contests. It\u2019s all about liability, and the Facebook promo guidelines are designed to distance the social network from whatever companies and bloggers do with their contests.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/promotions_guidelines.php\" target=\"_blank\">promo guidelines<\/a> apply to contests run on the Facebook platform. You are expressly prohibited from using Facebook functionality, including LIKE (formerly becoming a fan), as the mechanism for <strong>entering <\/strong>a contest or sweepstakes. Contests run on FB must follow Facebook\u2019s\u00a0promo guidelines, be approved by FB and use a third party application for the entry mechanism.<\/p>\n<p>You MAY restrict access to the tab where the contest resides on FB to &#8220;Likers&#8221; (formerly fans) which means someone does have to <strong>be <\/strong>a fan to enter on Facebook. HOWEVER, that is different than <strong>requiring <\/strong>someone become a fan. Semantics maybe, but it is a distinction that has meaning in law. It&#8217;s like the difference between holding a contest for your loyal fans\/customers and requiring a &#8220;purchase.&#8221; \u00a0Typically, contests run by big brands also will meet the *legal* requirements for contests and sweepstakes which require an offline\/non-purchase mechanism for entry that is publicized as part of the rules.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the promo guidelines say you cannot use language in your contest that requires someone to sign up for Facebook to participate in a promotion. You CAN direct them to a third party application on Facebook, but your promo language cannot stipulate membership. Semantics? Sure. Legally important. You betcha! \u201cNo purchase required.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This example tells us how to interpret use of Fan\/Like language in a promo. You cannot use language in a promotion on your blog, site or Facebook page, that asks a person to \u201clike\u201d a page to enter. To Like requires Membership, and use of that language is prohibited under the Terms Of Service (TOS). Facebook does not want its service involved in the <strong>administration <\/strong>of your contests. At all.<\/p>\n<p>That the Facebook Like is an extra, optional entry for a contest and the entrant has to submit some other initial entry to qualify? Doesn&#8217;t matter. That the entry is actually done by leaving a comment on your blog? Nope, doesn\u2019t matter. The language itself is in violation of the TOS.\u00a0You are using Facebook functionality as part of your contest and Facebook does NOT want that. I know many bloggers have been relying on this perceived loophole in their blog contests and sweepstakes, but it isn\u2019t a loophole. Don\u2019t kid yourselves.<\/p>\n<p>You can still promote a contest being run OFF Facebook on your Facebook page. That\u2019s promotion, and doesn\u2019t imply Facebook involvement in the running of a contest. Using Facebook\u2019s functionality, however, implies involvement, \u00a0and that\u2019s why the network expressly prohibits it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Advice for Bloggers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If you MUST run contests that involve Facebook, I think you can say something like this: \u00a0\u201cIf you are a fan of my page on Facebook, let me know in the comments on my blog for an (extra) entry in my contest.\u201d Better though is to leave Facebook activity out of it and just announce your promo. Unless you have the budget to hire a specialist to help you with your contest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Advice for Companies<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Use third party services like <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Wildfire Interactive\" rel=\"homepage\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wildfireapp.com\">Wildfire<\/a> or <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Votigo\" rel=\"homepage\" href=\"http:\/\/www.votigo.com\">Votigo<\/a> to implement your contest on Facebook and be sure to position it properly: \u00a0\u201cWe are thrilled to announce this contest for our loyal Facebook fans.\u201d \u00a0And feel free to call me. I figure this stuff out for a living, and am sure I am a lot less expensive than a lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p><em>Disclaimer: I am *not* a lawyer. But I *am* right about this.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>UPDATED: Be sure to read the comments. Some folks disagree with my interpretation, and I wrote a pretty long response comment on June 17th. This post was also syndicated on BlogHer and there are a few comments <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogher.com\/scoop-facebook-contests\" target=\"_blank\">there <\/a><\/em><em>as well.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"zemanta-pixie\" style=\"margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;\"><a class=\"zemanta-pixie-a\" title=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zemanta.com\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"zemanta-pixie-img\" style=\"border: none; float: right;\" src=\"https:\/\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.zemanta.com\/zemified_e.png?ssl=1\" alt=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><span class=\"zem-script more-related pretty-attribution\"><script src=\"https:\/\/static.zemanta.com\/readside\/loader.js\" type=\"text\/javascript\"><\/script><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Image via CrunchBase This morning, Mom 101\u00a0tweeted that a contest that requires \u201cliking\u201d a \u00a0Facebook page for entry violates the Facebook Terms of Service, and linked to my post from last January about the new Facebook (FB) contest rules.\u00a0Her tweet spawned an interesting Twitter stream that made it clear that both companies and bloggers are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":""},"categories":[5,68],"tags":[62],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=877"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":880,"href":"https:\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/877\/revisions\/880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/\/getgood.com\/roadmaps\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}