Customer Service (Part Two)

(warning, long post)

As I wrote in my previous post, it seems we have a serious disconnect when it comes to customer service. At the same time we champion the "conversation" with the customer, the general level of customer service is decreasing. Sure, there are exceptions, but stories like Mir’s recent internet service "dis-service" and Mary’s lovely experience on American Airlines seem to be the norm.

I’ve been wondering, why? Do products just "suck more?"  Are the occasional wonderful customer service stories really that WONDERFUL or is it that they just exceed our now much lower expectations?

What is customer service excellence?

First, let’s hear from two of the bloggers I used in my examples: Mir Kamin and TDavid.They both replied to my questions in email so I’ll let them speak for themselves. In part three, I’ll share some of my thoughts on the subject.

Mir:

"I think the norm of shoddy customer service,and yes, in a lot of ways I do think it’s become the norm) is yet another symptom of our "fast food society." Look, I’ve said it over at Cornered Office (and somewhat more obliquely, at Woulda Coulda Shoulda), but I’ll spell it out right here: I was on a plan that only cost $6.95/month. I’m not saying I necessarily DESERVED to get screwed, but honestly, what did I expect for that amount of money? We want it faster and cheaper and as a consumer body, THAT is what we demand, rather than quality and courtesy, sadly.

That said, lesson learned over here, bigtime. I can make all the excuses I want — they promised me service, I bought that plan when I was first starting out and was worried I couldn’t afford more, whatever. I’m paying a lot more for my new service, and at least this has taught me that it’s worth every penny.

The businesses that triumph in America right now are the ones that can do it the cheapest and the most conveniently. That’s why the Walmarts continue to thrive while the heart-and-soul community mom-and-pop stores struggle. You can’t be cheap, convenient AND personal. It just doesn’t add up. And most of us simply cannot afford to go top-shelf for most things.

Until we as a consumer body start making a lot of noise and putting our dollars where our mouths are, it’s not going to change.

Think about the best customer service you’ve heard lately. I’ll bet it was the Zappos story of the woman who not only ended up having them basically white-glove a return for her, but sent her flowers in condolence because when she was talking to the rep she mentioned that her mother had died. Zappos is committed to customer service and they do it better than almost anybody out there, right now. They are also INCREDIBLY expensive. They have to be.

Now. All of that said, I think a VAST IMPROVEMENT in customer service is possible without spending billions of dollars, and that’s to encourage CSRs to act like they care. In my situation, a lot of my ire could’ve been circumvented had the CSRs involved simply apologized and/or seemed less apathetic. That doesn’t take that much time and it would’ve made a world of difference. Maybe in today’s "GIMME" society "the customer is always right" is an impractical goal, but when did we just plain stop being NICE to the customer?"

TDavid:

Do products just "suck more?"

"Either it’s very coincidental or there is a direct correlation between more ad-supported software and services and negative customer experiences.

Somewhere along the line beta and release software and, as in the Xbox 360 case, hardware have merged. This has noticeably lowered the overall quality of products and services on a wider scale. In some cases these days customers are being expected to become unwilling beta testers and sometimes even paying for the privilege like the Xbox 360.

It’s one thing to not be charged in a beta test, it’s another to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars and be told the only solution is out of warranty repair or buying more of the same faulty hardware.

Microsoft in their much publicized Red Rings of Death warranty extension didn’t cover another common problem: game/DVD disc read errors. So if you have a machine that’s older than one year and doesn’t read discs any more, they’ll expect you to pay to get that fixed or you’ll need a third party warranty.

On the software side, the amount of time new/upgrade versions are being turned around seems to be shortening so that just when you start to get to an acceptable level of usefulness and value, you’re being asked to pay for a new version and rinse, repeat."

Are the good stories really wonderful or do they just exceed our now much lower expectations?

"Expectation levels are lower now, but there are still some positive stories out there. Harder to find, but they’re out there.

These days if a company ships something that runs on the computer without causing installation migraines or turning our computing experience into slow-mo that’s cause for joy, where that should be expected. Demanded.

We’re putting up with more negative customer experiences in web 2.0 than we should. Sites, services and mashups being engineered poorly that if they become popular won’t meet demand without major restructuring. Some services have come to the rescue like Amazon S3 to address these needs and that’s a good thing, but I see a lot of web 2.0 headstones over the next couple years that couldn’t make a viable business plan out of being ad-supported. VCs are already pulling life support systems, flatline imminent.

But it’s not just Web 2.0.

Marvel came out with a paid product: their comics online for $9.99/month and they couldn’t even scale up to demand. Spider-man is on the phone looking for help.

How funny is that? If we paid to access comics — and couldn’t because the site was down — would we receive some proportional refund of the time we couldn’t access?"

What is customer service excellence?

"For web services: fast response time, good, reliable uptime (at least 99.5%). Essential for paid services.

For all services/products: Minimum amount of time and hassle solving issues and problems. Being treated like an important asset of the business rather than a nuisance. In the case of faulty workmanship on a product, fixing it with as minimal hassle as possible. Companies that recognize and reward loyalty through better deals on future business being conducted, sharing income from referral sales and creative promotions are providing a valuable service.

And good customer service includes having an easy to find telephone number on the company website with an operator on the other side — preferably without having to navigate through a machine — that speaks clearly and doesn’t resort to some canned script to answer questions.

Bad customer service is forcing customers to email their responses, fill out a form or navigate through some confusing knowledge base and wait who knows how long only to be sent a scripted response. Or being told you have to pay $$$ just to talk to a human being about the problem installing the software or hardware you just purchased."

Thanks, Mir and TDavid for giving us such meaty food for thought. Tomorrow, I’ll share some of mine.

Update 12/10: Just a couple of links apropos of the customer service conversation. Geoff Livingston tells us about the Comcast must die blog and Lauren Vargas shares a piss-poor email response from a craft supplies company.

Tags: customer service