• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • getgood.com
  • Privacy & Disclosure
  • GDPR/CCPA Compliance
  • Contact

Marketing Roadmaps

Susan Getgood

Ghostwriting, Warren and Yippee

June 7, 2007 by Susan Getgood

As I wrote last month, I strongly believe that ghostwriting is not appropriate for blogs. Others disagree, and while I was out of pocket the past week or so, the conversation took flight again

Let’s be crystal clear: ghostwriting is when someone writes for another person and the item is published under the other person’s name. In books, you might see it as "By Very Famous Person, with Known Ghostwriter," although you may also see the "By, with" construct with co-authors when one is more well-known or made a greater contribution than the other. In blogs, you are not likely to see the ghostwriter’s name at all; the item is posted by the "author."

While ghostwriting is a legitimate approach to communications vehicles like the CEO letter in the annual report, magazine article or a speech, it is not a good approach for blogging. As Shel Holtz points out, blogging is a new communications channel that is supposed to remove barriers, not create new ones: 

[But] a blog by an identified senior executive is different. By blogging, the executive is specifically saying, “This is me engaged in a conversation with you.” While everyone knows that the quotes in the press release are fabricated, and that the speech was penned by a speechwriter, there is an expectation when someone reads and comments on Jonathan Schwartz’s blog that he’s engaged directly with Sun Microsystem’s CEO, not some anonymous proxy. When people learn that somebody other than the CEO is the blog’s true author, it will serve only to deepen the distrust and cynicism that characterizes most peoples’ existing perceptions of business.

That doesn’t mean that if your CEO can’t or won’t write, you can’t have a company blog or participate on blogs.  You just need to take a different approach. Shel mentions some possibilities in his post. Here are a few others. 

  • Hire a writer specifically for the blog. It can be a staff person or an outside consultant. Depending on the "editorial mission" you pick for the blog, she can post as a more impersonal "Company Name" or under her own name. If you choose  "Company Name"  you should disclose the approach and contributors somewhere on the blog. That readers can actually find. When I blog for clients, I prefer to write under my own name, but will do the "company name" approach if that suits the blog better.
  • Look around. See if there is a good blog on your company’s topic already in existence, and consider sponsoring it. It can be written by a customer or expert. Maybe even an employee writing on his own time  But remember: becoming a sponsor doesn’t mean you now own it. The blogger should retain her independence. Note: this could be slightly different if the blog were written by an employee. In this case, you might want to acquire it outright and make it part of the employee’s job.
  • Develop a group blog, with an editor responsible for the editorial calendar. Much like a magazine. Contributors can be employees, customers, outside experts, etc. etc. This can be a challenging task but well worth it. The group brings diversity of opinion and distributes the posting burden among a larger number. That generally means more posts and ultimately more visibility. It’s no accident that the top blogs are group blogs. Your editor can be internal or external, and post under his own name or the company’s.

All these approaches are legitimate ways to engage with blogs without resorting to the artificiality of ghostwriting.

***********

Two shout outs

To Grace Davis for her post "Enjoy Every Sandwich" A little Warren was just what I needed today, thanks for the reminder.

To Mary Schmidt for her Yippees and Yawns. Excellent advice for anyone embarking on a Web site project. Or wondering why no one ever visits their site 🙂

 

Tags: ghostwriting, corporate blogging, CEO blogging

Filed Under: Blogging, Marketing, PR

Defining Social Media Success

June 6, 2007 by Susan Getgood

How do we define success in a blogger relations campaign or blog initiative? WHO defines success?

In yesterday’s post on Blogola, I mentioned a post by Mack Collier that criticized both the recent Nikon outreach to PR and marketing bloggers and CBS TV’s outreach last spring to a group of parent bloggers. In both cases, Mack’s criticism wasn’t of the blog outreach itself, which I should have made clearer in my previous post. Rather, he chastised both groups for not going far enough, for reaching out without soliciting feedback from the bloggers. As he stated in the comments to my Blogola post:

My problem is in the execution, because I think both initiatives have/had a golden opportunity to collect valuable feedback from bloggers, and aren’t taking advantage of it. Apparently all CBS did was smooze some mommy bloggers on the set, and throw freebies at them and hope they go home with stars in their eyes and gush about how great the show is. That’s fine, but why not ALSO actually TALK to these bloggers and ask them how CBS can utilize social media effectively? Is throwing freebies at bloggers a feasible social-media plan for the long-term?

I respect Mack, and quite often agree with him. This isn’t one of those times.

We have to get over the idea that we are "doing social media" and  that there is a prescribed, preferred way of "doing it" that defines the effort as successful. We are doing marketing campaigns or PR outreach or customer evangelism using social media tools. We are reaching out to customers who blog. Hopefully, we have a marketing plan that uses all the appropriate tools and tactics, new and old, not a social media plan that focuses on social media tools even if they aren’t the most appropriate or effective for a given objective.

Now, I know that wasn’t what Mack was suggesting in his comments or his post. He saw it as lost opportunity to get customer feedback, and he is by no means the only person to express this viewpoint. To some extent he is right. Both campaigns could be viewed as opportunities to gather customer feedback and it seems they have not done so. However,  just because they could have asked for feedback does not mean they should have. At least in these specific efforts.

The measure of success of a program, whether social or traditional media, is whether it achieves its objectives, not whether it meets an observer’s expectations.

Successful marketing programs have focus — a clear, primary objective. The best ads make one point, not many. Why? Because it is generally more effective to do one thing well, really well. Trying to do too much, be all things to all people is a recipe for disaster. A jumbled Web site with no clear path or call to action. A direct marketing piece that never gets to the point because it is trying to make all of them.

In the case of the Nikon Picture This campaign and the New Adventures of Old Christine set visit, the primary objective was to spread the word. In my opinion, both succeeded.

Should the companies consider further outreach to solicit feedback and opinion from bloggers? Absolutely. But every project doesn’t have do everything.

I wasn’t personally involved in either effort, but I know Liz Gumbinner, one of the parent bloggers invited on the CBS set visit.  I thought it would be interesting to get her perspective on Mack’s post and the WSJ article that inspired it.

To start with, she thought the WSJ article was misleading,  in both tone and fact. For example, something she wrote on Mom-101 was attributed to Yvonne from joyunexpected.com. As to whether CBS solicited feedback from the invited bloggers, she says:

Just because something isn’t mentioned in an article doesn’t mean it didn’t happen….While there was no opportunity on the set to sit down and critique the show (which..well, duh. When do you get tickets to Letterman and then have a chance to pick apart the opening monologue with him afterwards?) there was ample opportunity to discuss the show with the PR and show contacts afterwards or by email.

She also reiterated that CBS never asked anyone to write about the show or the set visit, only requested that if they did, they include the new date/time of the show in their post. Now if you’ve ever read Liz’s blog,  you know that Mom-101 doesn’t gush. Nor did she in her post about the set visit.

To Mack’s point that CBS should have done more, obtained more feedback from the bloggers, she was fine with the fact that CBS was using the bloggers as a PR channel, not a focus group.

As a marketer  I know that sometimes opinion leaders are used to guide the product development process, and sometimes they’re used to get the word out when the product is completed. In this case, we were a tool for the latter. I’ve got no beef with that. I think they handled the entire experience very well in fact. It was well coordinated and organized and we all had a really fun day. It certainly beats the “do you want a free sample of my new pudding packs” solicitations we normally get as “mom bloggers.”

Also, for the record, they didn’t “fly us in.” Good lord. We were all in the LA area and the couple who weren’t came in on their own dimes because they wanted to be there. The dvds they “threw us” were just cheaply laid off copies of a few show episodes so we could familiarize ourselves with the show before the visit – certainly nothing we could resell on the black market. And did we “happily post about how we loved the experience?” Yep.

Because we did.

It was fun.

Sue me.

CBS had a goal — to spread the word about the show and the new day/time to the audience. One of the ways it decided to do this was by reaching out to parent bloggers. Most, if not all, did indeed write about the show/visit and came away from the experience with positive feelings about the network. That’s a win all around — happy bloggers, happy network.

And that’s success, at least in my book.

Tags: Nikon, New Adventures of Old Christine, CBS, blogger relations

Filed Under: Blogger relations

Blogola?

June 5, 2007 by Susan Getgood

What is all the fuss about? Really.

A month or so ago, Nikon launched a blogger relations campaign aimed at PR and marketing bloggers. Gave ’em use of a digital SLR camera. Seemed to have covered all the bases for doing blogger relations —  transparency, clarity, targeted pitch, etc. 

And then whoops, the accusations of blogola started. Eric Eggertson summarizes some of them here. Mack Collier of the Viral Garden also had a problem with it, as well as with a CBS outreach around the TV program The New Adventures of Old Christine (more on that in another post later this week).

I’m confused.

Just exactly what is the problem with asking influential customers and potential customers to try out products? It’s part of Western culture. And has been as far back as we have had commerce.

By appointment to the Queen was all about patronage; merchants supplied goods to the sovereign and other nobles as a way of advertising their wares. And it still happens — the couture houses and high end jewelers like Harry Winston bend over backwards to get the chance to dress and bejewel the big name celebrities and top actresses. Not because us regular folk can afford the stuff we see them wear. But because we just might buy something from company’s "off the rack" product line.

Advertising, for good or for ill, is based on the idea that we, the customers, will buy things used by people like us or people we want to be like. Because guess what? We will.

If a blogger has influence with other people like him, it’s a smart business move to reach out to him. If you sell a tangible product that you can let her try, why wouldn’t you let a blogger try it out? Marketing 101: get someone to TRY something, you are nearly there. 

As long as everything is done in the light of day, as long as you don’t tell her what to say, what’s the problem? Calling it blogola, as in payola, implies some sort of secret dealings. Umm, maybe I’m missing something, but Nikon’s campaign seems pretty above board.

Unless of course you didn’t get a camera….

Seriously, if a company has confidence in its products and is willing to put them out on trial, we should applaud, not deride, their efforts. Sure, they are trying to sell something. So what. I’m just glad to see them extending their outreach beyond the glitterati and beyond traditional media.

Even if I didn’t get a camera 🙂

Tags: blogola, blogger relations, Nikon

Filed Under: Blogger relations

Comment Spam

June 4, 2007 by Susan Getgood

Over the weekend, I got slammed with a bunch of comment spam to old posts. I’ve closed comments and trackbacks on the posts and apologize to those of you that read the blog in a feed. I know Typepad republishes the posts, so some of the feedreaders are redelivering some pretty old stuff to you today.

I promise — new stuff, today or tomorrow. In the meantime, here are my wish list items for Six Apart.

Can we have the ability to change the comment and trackback status for multiple posts at once without republishing the posts?  Comment and trackback spammers target old (pre-captcha) Typepad posts, and the only way to block them is to close comments and turn off trackbacks, post by post. Which is time consuming. 

I’d also love to be able to set a time window for comments and trackbacks to be open.

Filed Under: Blogging

Blogger Relations Extra Credit Question

May 24, 2007 by Susan Getgood

Jeneane Sessum and Todd Defren both posted excellent quizzes for any pr or marketing agency that purports to be a social media or blogging expert.

I have your extra credit question.

This week has seen two rather interesting blogger relations mis-steps: the Fleishman Hillard "Marlo Thomas" pitch and the Vocus white paper "spam."  Many people have posted about these two incidents; if you need to catch up start here, here and here.

In addition to all the other advice you can find, on this blog and elsewhere, a couple points bear repeating and are the subject of today’s extra credit question.

First, give something first. Don’t ask the blogger to write about you. Give him something he wants — information, trial product, access, whatever. No strings attached. That’s what makes it a GIFT. And try to do it with a minimum of  "marketing speak." If you wouldn’t say it, don’t send it. Try it sometime. Read one of your email pitches out loud. After you get over how stupid it sounds, fix it.

Second, remember: with bloggers, you do have a window into their lives. Make sure you aren’t approaching them at an inappropriate time. Personal/life bloggers blog about their lives, so there is no excuse for not knowing. But even business bloggers give clues. Look for them and reach out appropriately.

Here’s the question: would you pitch me on something this week? Specifically tomorrow May 25th. What would you pitch to me and why?

Okay, it’s the holiday weekend, so I am going to give you the answer.

Unless you are the manufacturer of a hot convertible and want to give me a demo model to test drive for the next month or you can offer me a set visit to Battlestar Galactica, I would seriously advise you to steer clear. And the reason why is only one click away from this blog, on my new photo blog Snapshot Chronicles. I also twitted about it. In other words, the information about my craptastic day is pretty much public record.

I’ll make it even easier for you. Even though Marketing Roadmaps is a business blog, if you read it, even just once in a while, you’d probably know:

  • I am married and have a 7 year old son Douglas.
  • I breed and show Scottish Terriers.
  • I am a huge science fiction and fantasy fan with a current obsession with Battlestar Galactica. You can introduce me to Jamie Bamber, Edward James Olmos, Nathan Fillion, Adam Baldwin or James Marsters? You can frak-ing fill my inbox with as much spam as you want.
  • I am a lifelong Democrat. 
  • I am vocal supporter of equal rights and often write about gender issues.
  • I occasionally do book reviews on the blog but I have never reviewed products.
  • I hate, hate, hate getting press releases with no cover note. Really.
  • I just launched a new blog called Snapshot Chronicles.
  • Today pretty much sucked.

These are easy to find clues about me, all accessible from Marketing Roadmaps. And guess what? I am not alone. Every blogger — personal, business, even anonymous — leaves clues about her interests, affiliations, current activities on the blog. Even what happened on a particularly craptastic day.

It isn’t about pitching bloggers. It’s about getting to know them and providing the information that THEY want, not just the information that you want to share. As I wrote to a colleague earlier today, don’t think about what you want to say TO your customer. Instead, think like your customer.

And by the way, that set visit? I’m waiting patiently. Ron Moore? David Eick? Are you listening?

Tags: Battlestar Galactica, blogger relations, pr, public relations

Filed Under: Blogger relations, Science Fiction

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 81
  • Go to page 82
  • Go to page 83
  • Go to page 84
  • Go to page 85
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.” – Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

Recent Posts

  • Merging onto the Metaverse – the Creator Economy and Web 2.5
  • Getting ready for the paradigm shift from Web2 to Web3
  • The changing nature of influence – from Lil Miquela to Fashion Ambitionist

Speaking Engagements

An up-to-date-ish list of speaking engagements and a link to my most recent headshot.

My Book



genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Brands

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.

genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Influencers

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.
Susan Getgood
Tweets by @sgetgood

Subscribe to Posts via Email

Marketing Roadmaps posts

Categories

BlogWithIntegrity.com

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Lifestyle Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}