• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • getgood.com
  • Privacy & Disclosure
  • GDPR/CCPA Compliance
  • Contact

Marketing Roadmaps

Blogging

Blogging elsewhere…

June 20, 2010 by Susan Getgood

I’ll try to have a post up here sometime later this week. In the meantime, here’s where I was writing this past week.

Snapshot Chronicles: It’s all in how you ask – about a recent request to use one of my Flickr photos in a print magazine. For free. You can guess how well that went over.

Snapshot Chronicles Roadtrip: Paris with Kids: Tour Montparnasse, le Jardin du Luxembourg and Montmartre

BlogHer: Is Mainstream Media Scared of Social Media and information about the upcoming Boston Area Pre-Blogher BBQ on July 17th

Filed Under: Blogging, BlogHer

The scoop on Facebook contests

June 9, 2010 by Susan Getgood

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...
Image via CrunchBase

This morning, Mom 101 tweeted that a contest that requires “liking” a  Facebook page for entry violates the Facebook Terms of Service, and linked to my post from last January about the new Facebook (FB) contest rules. Her tweet spawned an interesting Twitter stream that made it clear that both companies and bloggers are still unclear about the Facebook contest rules.

Walk this way for some clarity. Keep in mind, I am not a lawyer and do not play one on the interwebs. However, I’m good at parsing legalese, and pretty sure I’ve got the right end of the stick here.

Mom 101 is right and here’s why.

Bottom line, Facebook doesn’t want any explicit involvement in ANY of your contests. It’s all about liability, and the Facebook promo guidelines are designed to distance the social network from whatever companies and bloggers do with their contests.

Facebook’s promo guidelines apply to contests run on the Facebook platform. You are expressly prohibited from using Facebook functionality, including LIKE (formerly becoming a fan), as the mechanism for entering a contest or sweepstakes. Contests run on FB must follow Facebook’s promo guidelines, be approved by FB and use a third party application for the entry mechanism.

You MAY restrict access to the tab where the contest resides on FB to “Likers” (formerly fans) which means someone does have to be a fan to enter on Facebook. HOWEVER, that is different than requiring someone become a fan. Semantics maybe, but it is a distinction that has meaning in law. It’s like the difference between holding a contest for your loyal fans/customers and requiring a “purchase.”  Typically, contests run by big brands also will meet the *legal* requirements for contests and sweepstakes which require an offline/non-purchase mechanism for entry that is publicized as part of the rules.

Further, the promo guidelines say you cannot use language in your contest that requires someone to sign up for Facebook to participate in a promotion. You CAN direct them to a third party application on Facebook, but your promo language cannot stipulate membership. Semantics? Sure. Legally important. You betcha! “No purchase required.”

This example tells us how to interpret use of Fan/Like language in a promo. You cannot use language in a promotion on your blog, site or Facebook page, that asks a person to “like” a page to enter. To Like requires Membership, and use of that language is prohibited under the Terms Of Service (TOS). Facebook does not want its service involved in the administration of your contests. At all.

That the Facebook Like is an extra, optional entry for a contest and the entrant has to submit some other initial entry to qualify? Doesn’t matter. That the entry is actually done by leaving a comment on your blog? Nope, doesn’t matter. The language itself is in violation of the TOS. You are using Facebook functionality as part of your contest and Facebook does NOT want that. I know many bloggers have been relying on this perceived loophole in their blog contests and sweepstakes, but it isn’t a loophole. Don’t kid yourselves.

You can still promote a contest being run OFF Facebook on your Facebook page. That’s promotion, and doesn’t imply Facebook involvement in the running of a contest. Using Facebook’s functionality, however, implies involvement,  and that’s why the network expressly prohibits it.

Advice for Bloggers

If you MUST run contests that involve Facebook, I think you can say something like this:  “If you are a fan of my page on Facebook, let me know in the comments on my blog for an (extra) entry in my contest.” Better though is to leave Facebook activity out of it and just announce your promo. Unless you have the budget to hire a specialist to help you with your contest.

Advice for Companies

Use third party services like Wildfire or Votigo to implement your contest on Facebook and be sure to position it properly:  “We are thrilled to announce this contest for our loyal Facebook fans.”  And feel free to call me. I figure this stuff out for a living, and am sure I am a lot less expensive than a lawsuit.

Disclaimer: I am *not* a lawyer. But I *am* right about this.

UPDATED: Be sure to read the comments. Some folks disagree with my interpretation, and I wrote a pretty long response comment on June 17th. This post was also syndicated on BlogHer and there are a few comments there as well.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Filed Under: Blogging, Facebook Tagged With: Facebook

Professional Blogging For Dummies

June 1, 2010 by Susan Getgood

As you know, for the past six months, I’ve been writing Professional Blogging For Dummies (affiliate link). Due out at the end of July, the book has been a big part of my life for the last year. Over the weekend, I noticed that Amazon had added the cover art to the pre-order listing, so I created an affiliate badge. It’s  over there –>  in the far right sidebar 🙂

Throughout the book, I use real examples to illustrate the points. Some interviews became case studies, other information was used as background, but everyone’s contribution was important. Even though I recognize everyone in the acknowledgements, I wanted to do it here as well.

Thank you,

Rita Arens, Surrender Dorothy, surrenderdorothy.typepad.com

Joanne Bamberger, Pundit Mom, punditmom.com

Carla Birnberg, MizFitOnline, mizfitonline.com

Janice Bissex and Liz Weiss, Meal Makeover Moms, mealmakeovermoms.com

Beth Blecherman, Tech Mamas, techmamas.com

Ciaran Blumenfeld, Momfluential, momfluential.net

Kristin Brandt, Manic Mommies, manicmommies.com

Stefania Pomponi Butler, CityMama, citymama.typepad.com

Megan Capone, A Girl Must Shop, agirlmustshop.com

Sarah Caron, Sarah’s Cucina Bella, sarahscucinabella.com/

Kristen Chase, Motherhood Uncensored, motherhooduncensored.net

Marie Cloutier, Boston Bibliophile, bostonbibliophile.com

Kimberly Coleman, Mom in the City, mominthecity.com

Allison Czarnecki, Petit Elefant, petitelefant.com

Kevin Dugan, Bad Pitch Blog, badpitch.blogspot.com

Danielle Friedland, daniellefriedland.com

Tracey Gaughran-Perez, MamaPop, mamapop.com

Jodi Grundig, Mom’s Favorite Stuff, momsfavoritestuff.com

Jaden Hair, Steamy Kitchen, steamykitchen.com

Edward Hasbrouck, The Practical Nomad, www.hasbrouck.org/blog/

Chris Hogan, Off the Cuff, offthecuffdc.com

Megan Jordan, Velveteen Mind, velveteenmind.com

Mir Kamin, Want Not, wantnot.net

Matt Kepnes, Nomadic Matt’s Travel Site, nomadicmatt.com

Christine Koh, Boston Mamas, bostonmamas.com

Preston Koerner, Jetson Green, jetsongreen.com

Debbie Lawrence, Lagniappe Marketing, lagniappemarketing.net

Jeff McIntire-Strasburg, Sustainablog, sustainablog.org

Jill Notkin, The Daily Grind of the Work at Home Mom, workathomemom.typepad.com/the_daily_grind_of_a_work/

Sherry & John Petersik, Young House Love, younghouselove.com

Florinda Pendley Vasquez, The 3 R’s Blog, 3rsblog.com

Kyran Pitman, Notes To Self, notestoself.us

Devra Renner, Parentopia, parentopia.net/blog

Deb Roby, A Stitch In Time, astitchintime.blogspot.com

In addition, a  number of professional colleagues  were gracious enough to share their expertise on specific topics.

Thank you,

Liza Barry-Kessler, Privacy Counsel LLC, privacycounsel.net and Liza Was Here, lizawashere.com (Chapter 3)

Chris Baskind, chrisbaskind.com (Chapter 9)

Toby Bloomberg, Diva Marketing, divamarketingblog.com (Chapter 12)

Todd Defren, SHIFT Public Relations and blog PR Squared, pr-squared.com (Chapter 12)

Yvonne DiVita, Windsor Media Books, wmebooks.com and Lip-sticking, lipsticking.com (Chapters 5 & 7)

Liz Gumbinner, Cool Mom Picks, coolmompicks.com and Mom-101, mom101.com (Chapter 6)

David Herrington, Active Oak LLC, activeoak.com (Chapters 4 , 5 & 8 )

Kami Watson Huyse, Communication Overtones, overtonecomm.blogspot.com and Zoetica, zoeticamedia.com (Chapter 12)

Jaelithe Judy, jaejudy.com (Chapter 11)

Kim Kramer, Berluti & McLaughlin, bermac-law.com (Chapter 3)

Julie Marsh, Cool Mom Picks, coolmompicks.com (Chapter 6)

Elisa Camahort Page, BlogHer, blogher.com (Chapter 6)

Ike Pigott, Occam’s Razr, occamsrazr.com (Chapter 12)

Jim Prather, YouData, youdata.com (Chapter 6)

Laura Tomasetti, 360 Public Relations, 360prblog.com (Chapter 12)

David Wescott, APCO Worldwide and blog It’s Not a Lecture, itsnotalecture.blogspot.com (Chapter 12)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Filed Under: Blogging, Professional Blogging For Dummies Tagged With: Blogging For Dummies)

Rambling down my road: random-ish thoughts on blogger relations and expertise

May 29, 2010 by Susan Getgood

For the past few months, I’ve been head down working on Professional Blogging For Dummies, and there just hasn’t been a lot of time to write blog posts. A few things were just too important to let slide, like the FTC/Ann Taylor Loft story, but for the most part I’ve had to let many juicy stories go.

Like the pitch for an FDA approved douche sent to bloggers of both genders. Or the one for a snake repellent sent to mom bloggers in Manhattan. Seriously, outside of the zoo, how often do you see a snake of the reptilian variety in New York City?

Then there are the brand ambassador programs that seem to be multiplying like rabbits. For example, the Sears Outlet brand ambassador program with the laundry list of requirements for the bloggers but zero compensation.

Somehow, we’ve lost the distinction between public relations, which relies on a compelling story to “earn” the placement in the media outlet (hence the term “earned media,” more about that below), and promotion, which is a sales-related activity closely related to advertising. Many blogger programs are really about promotion, but they offer little or no compensation to the bloggers for what is essentially advertising space. Read Liz Gumbinner’s posts for more on this: Nothing is free, except it seems, a mommyblogger and In defense of PR.

And then there was last week’s dust-up between a blogger who took umbrage at, and posted about, a specific pitch, and a pretty strong response from the mentioned agency. I haven’t looked at the specifics of the post or program in question, but my immediate reaction reading the agency’s post was a certain amount of amazement that the author didn’t seem  realize that the very questions she was raising in her post have been circling around the blogosphere for years. Read Julie Pippert’s The elephant in the room? Not so much for more about this specific post and its aftermath.

Earned media is a dinosaur
I participated in my first conference panel on blogger relations at BlogHer Business in 2007. More than 3 years later, I often feel like we haven’t moved forward at all. We’re still arguing about the same things — Are the pitches good, targeted and relevant? Are bloggers journalists? And so on. Blah Blah Blah.

This discussion is old and tired, and it’s not going anywhere except down a rathole. We need to move on. As Julie (@jpippert)  and I discussed on Twitter after I read her post, earned media is a dinosaur. We need a new model.

One that understands that the blogger is also a customer, not just a reporter. That the old forms of engagement don’t work anymore. And that both sides — PR and bloggers — need to look at the relationship through a new lens. Companies and their PR agents aren’t doing bloggers “a favor” by including them in their programs. There’s an expected business benefit. And bloggers aren’t entitled to anything. If you want to participate in blogger relations or advertising programs, you’ve got to build a compelling blog that attracts an audience that the companies and advertisers want to reach.

The successful approach for reaching out to bloggers integrates public relations and advertising to achieve marketing objectives. If the story is compelling, PR outreach. If the company wants to control a message, advertising.

This flies in the face of the typical corporate organization and certainly agency alignments, and absolutely requires a change in the way we look at our marketing task. I’ve been writing about this changing model for some time now, and will continue to write about it here and at Shamable.com.

Expertise

True expertise is less about knowing how to do something than understanding why you’re doing it. Always start by asking Why? Then worry about How?  Check out Toby Bloomberg’s e-book Social Media Marketing GPS for advice from 40 social media experts that truly understand the why and the how. I was doubly privileged with regard to this book — I was one of the people Toby interviewed on Twitter for the book and I was in Atlanta the day she launched, so I got to celebrate with her in person.

Also on my radar screen (and bound to be the topics of upcoming posts): more on measurement, including some thoughts on the importance of sentiment, and another look at Facebook after the privacy dilemmas of the past month. What are the implication for marketers and consumers?

Finally, thank you to the folks at Ignite Social Media for including Marketing Roadmaps (and me) on their list of 50 Women Bloggers You Should Be Reading. I’m not a terrific fan of lists, but feel privileged to be included in this company.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Filed Under: Blogger relations, Blogging, PR Tagged With: Advertising, BlogHer, Business, Public relations

You have not reached Good Technology customer support when you call me!

May 13, 2010 by Susan Getgood

If you’ve been reading Marketing Roadmaps for a while, you are familiar with the Good Technology saga.

Basically, they have a website: get.good.com. I have a website: getgood.com

Sometimes  their customers get confused and call me for support. Yeah, it’s a bit borked. If you are a new reader, you can catch up with these posts:

  • From 2007:  one and two
  • From 2006:  one and two

Since Fall 2007 (the second post linked above), things quieted down quite a bit. I know people were still hitting my site looking for Good based on the search terms they used, but only an occasional call.

Until this month. They’re back, and once again it appears that someone in the chain is handing out MY PHONE NUMBER for support.

Below is the text of the email I sent to Good’s PR contact this morning. I’ll let you know if I hear back.

—

Dear Ms. O’Connell:

My name is Susan Getgood, and I own the domain getgood.com. For the last 5 years, ever since I began using the domain for a business website, I have regularly gotten calls for support on your technology. People confused about get.good.com versus getgood.com.

Now I am not sure why people land on my site and DO NOT realize that I am not a mobile phone software company, but it happens. To help with the issue,  I believe people at Good even worked with Google to make sure that your site comes up first in a search for “getgood.” I also have notices on my contact page that provide your contact information, which I know helps, as I have had about 60 hits to my site this month from key words like get.good.com  and “get good” but only a few calls per week.

Nevertheless, I can always tell when something has changed in your product because the calls do pick up again. At all hours of the day. The latest one (at 10pm Monday), however, was a bit disturbing. According to the caller, my PHONE NUMBER, which is both a home and business line,  is being provided by AT&T iPhone support to call with problems with your software.

This is not the first time I have heard this comment – that mobile phone companies are giving out my phone number. Once one even connected a caller directly.

Can you please look into this, and if AT&T is indeed providing my phone number to people, get it stopped?

Sincerely,

Susan Getgood

Please note: I have been documenting this issue on my blog Marketing Roadmaps, getgood.com/roadmaps, since the problems began. This email and any response I receive from you will be posted in its entirety.

Filed Under: Blogging, Customer Service Tagged With: get.good.com, Good Technology

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 100
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.” – Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

Recent Posts

  • Merging onto the Metaverse – the Creator Economy and Web 2.5
  • Getting ready for the paradigm shift from Web2 to Web3
  • The changing nature of influence – from Lil Miquela to Fashion Ambitionist

Speaking Engagements

An up-to-date-ish list of speaking engagements and a link to my most recent headshot.

My Book



genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Brands

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.

genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Influencers

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.
Susan Getgood
Tweets by @sgetgood

Subscribe to Posts via Email

Marketing Roadmaps posts

Categories

BlogWithIntegrity.com

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Lifestyle Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}