• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • getgood.com
  • Privacy & Disclosure
  • GDPR/CCPA Compliance
  • Contact

Marketing Roadmaps

Susan Getgood

More on RSS aggregators and some other random stuff

April 4, 2005 by Susan Getgood

RSS aggregators

As regular readers of this blog know, I am a big fan of RSS aggregators. Some of my feelings about blogrolls (and utility thereof) are no doubt related to the fact that I read blogs (and any websites I can) in my RSS aggregator (Bloglines if you care) so I rarely see blogrolls.

A couple of good resource articles last week on RSS.

  • Scoble on RSS aggregators  with a quick addition
  • BL Ochman’s great non-techie guide to RSS (link from Diva Marketing)

Random Stuff

Via Communication Revolutions , a link to Robin Good’s Best Blog Directory and Submission sites

Also from the Diva: 55 women bloggers. I am proud to be on the list, in no particular order J Thanks, Toby. Go to her main page for the post; I can’t get permalinks or trackbacks to the DIva to work for this link. I will fix it later if I can.

Always a great blog for good tactical sales/marketing strategy, Jim Logan has a nice post on testimonials.

Filed Under: Blogging, Business Management, Marketing, PR, Web Marketing

Thanks, Marketing Playbook

March 31, 2005 by Susan Getgood

For some reason, no matter what I do, I am unable to leave comments on the Marketing Playbook blog.  I’ve registered two Typekey accounts, and neither will work. So, to the guys at Marketing Playbook, thanks for mentioning Marketing Roadmaps as a Business Blog you like.

Filed Under: Blogging, Marketing, Web Marketing

Corporate blogging policies

March 29, 2005 by Susan Getgood

Four excellent posts recently on corporate blogging policies.

From Working Smart, the ongoing evolution of the blogging policy at Thomas Nelson publishers.

From Blog Business World, Corporate blogging guidelines – here to stay

From Diva Marketing, Corporate blogging guidelines and Give Corporate Bloggers a Voice

From my archives, you might also want to check out the second half of Blogging  and the online intersection between a job and your private life.

Filed Under: Blogging, Business Management

Lead Rating System

March 26, 2005 by Susan Getgood

At reader request, here is more detail on lead rating systems. Fair warning: this is a long post.

Before I get into numbers, let’s start with some baseline assumptions:

A prospect is defined as someone who has demonstrated specific interest in your offering, usually by taking some action relative to a marketing program. In other words, they have raised their hand.

In any pool of prospects, roughly 15% are really ready to take action in the near term. We’ll call those sales leads.

Of the balance, about 20% are probably junk, and the other 80% are longer term. Let’s continue to call that longer term group, prospects.

The goal of an integrated sales and marketing program is to:

–         Classify the prospects. This is what the lead rating system does.

–         Assign the sales leads immediately to sales.

–         Develop nurturing programs for prospects to convert them to leads

I have a number of previous posts on this process, here and here and here. Today we’ll focus on the lead rating.

Okay, so how do we classify our prospects?

For just about every product, there are three common questions:

What is the timeframe of purchase?

Does the prospect have a budget?

Does the prospect have purchase authority? (decisionmaker)

These three questions form the basis of a lead rating questionnaire.

In addition to these basic questions, there are additional parameters that help us determine the lead rating. Two important ones are whether the prospect is a present/past customer, and the specific action they took when they indicated interest. Requesting a sales call is usually indicative of greater interest than downloading a brochure. Likewise a returning customer is generally more likely to purchase than a completely new prospect.

Finally, every company will have one or two things that the sales and marketing team believes is absolutely crucial to know for the lead rating.  Personally, I have yet to be convinced that to calculate a lead rating, you really need more than the five variables I listed here first, but it is easy enough to accommodate them in my model, so I do J

Step one is to develop the questionnaire that will surface the necessary answers to calculate the rating. For many of you, it will be a web questionnaire, but it could also be completed at a trade show or by a tele-marketing or tele-sales rep.

You will need to map the answers to the lead ranking model. The lead ranking model is a numerical system, with a maximum score of 100. Here is the basic framework. You MUST tailor it to your situation.

Total points: 100

Timeframe:    25

Action:          25

Budget:         20

Authority:      10

Customer:      10

Custom value: 5

Custom value: 5      

Timeframe scores: You may adjust your Timeframe ranges based on your sales cycle, but the total value must not exceed 25 points. Here is a place to start.

Immediate:    25

1-3 months:   25

3-6 months:   15

6-12 months: 5

> 12 months: 0

Action scores: You will use your actual “actions” here, but the model is:

The most indicative actions get 25 points.

Mid-range actions get 15 points.

Common actions (download a brochure, trade show booth) get 10 points.

Any time you need to calculate a rating with no action, assign 0 points.

Only one action is counted – there are huge implications to this for automated systems like CRM which go way beyond this post. My opinion: if you can get an initial lead ranking done, you will be light years ahead of most companies J

Budget:

Yes:             20

No:               0

“Don’t know”: 10

Don’t know gets points because a lower level person assigned to do research might not know the budget but other factors may push the opportunity up the scale.

Authority: This is the only additive score, with up to 10 points possible

Research alternatives: 0

Perform technical evaluation: 2

Recommend vendor/product: 2

Approve budget: 3

Approve purchase: 3

You can also make this a binary question, Yes/No With purchase authority equal to 10 points and No equal to 0. It really depends on your product and sales cycle.

Customer: 10 points for past/current customer

Custom values: The custom values are allowed a total of 10 points. You can have two at 5 points each or a single one at 10 points. No matter what you choose, I recommend you select binary yes/no questions. Yes equals all the points, No equals zero. You can also add these points back into one of the other variables.

In the end, what you want is a framework that will help you rate your prospects according to your business.

Step Two:

Use the rating framework to assign a ranking to your prospects. Your mileage may vary, and you should develop test cases to validate the ranges, but here is a starting point:

“A” lead: 76-100 points

“B” lead: 51-75 points

“C” prospect: 30-50 points

“D” prospect: 0-29 points

For example, a top A lead with 100 points: has immediate timeframe, budget, is a past/present customer, has purchase authority, scores high on the Action variable and the 2 custom values. Typically, B leads will score low on one of the high-valued variables, C prospects, low on two of the high-valued variables. This reflects the reality that your best leads are ready to buy right now,with immediate timeframe, budget and authority to buy, and the next best group typically is missing something like budget or has a longer timeframe.  And so on.

All the mathematical model does is quantify the reality.

To fine-tune the system to your needs, your sales and marketing team should profile their good leads and prospects against the system to validate the numerical values.

Please DO NOT take this framework as gospel. This is just one way to structure the lead rating framework, and I hope it gives you a good place to start.

Filed Under: Business Management, Customers, Integrated Sales & Marketing, Marketing

Roadmaps Round-up

March 23, 2005 by Susan Getgood

Later this week I will have a post about calculating lead ratings, requested by a reader in Korea. I do love the Internet, and the way it lets you virtually meet people from all over the world.

It is a fairly involved topic though, so I probably won’t get to it until the end of the week.

In the meantime, I have a few links that I have been saving up to write about, and just won’t get the time before they are stale. So here they are in list form:

Courtesy Topaz Partners, a link to an article in CMO magazine about marketers embracing the blog form.

A post from Working Smart about Corporate Blogging Rules. Commentary by NevOn on same. I will come back to this topic I am sure 🙂

From AdRants (and others), Forbes article on the top corporate hate sites

From CorporatePR blog (Elizabeth Albrycht): 10 ideas for corporate RSS feeds

UPDATE: from Media Guerilla, a post about Feedster’s public blog policy.

Filed Under: Blogging, Humour, Marketing, Web Marketing

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 144
  • Go to page 145
  • Go to page 146
  • Go to page 147
  • Go to page 148
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 158
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.” – Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

Recent Posts

  • Merging onto the Metaverse – the Creator Economy and Web 2.5
  • Getting ready for the paradigm shift from Web2 to Web3
  • The changing nature of influence – from Lil Miquela to Fashion Ambitionist

Speaking Engagements

An up-to-date-ish list of speaking engagements and a link to my most recent headshot.

My Book



genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Brands

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.

genconnectU course: Influencer Marketing for Influencers

Download the course.
Use code Susan10 for 10% off.
Susan Getgood
Tweets by @sgetgood

Subscribe to Posts via Email

Marketing Roadmaps posts

Categories

BlogWithIntegrity.com

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Lifestyle Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}